![]() ![]() However, regardless of the directory you’re currently viewing, the mobile client can only upload files (one at a time!) to the “Web Archive” folder, which is defined as: editing in Quickoffice), and to share files and folders, SugarSync should be a great mobile collaboration tool. With the ability to open files in your local applications (e.g. ![]() Similarly, by sharing a folder with someone, they can drag and drop a file for you to access while out and about. The real benefit of this is that when you’re away from your desktop computer, you can still get your files to those who need them quickly. Fortunately, you don’t need to copy and paste from the Contacts application as SugarSync taps directly into your address book and lets you select multiple contacts. The mobile client also lets you initiate sharing of files and folders by email address. That might not sound too bad, but it’s related to a notable problem we’ll arrive at later. Options for managing your files are limited to opening and renaming though, you can’t move files. As such, you can browse the desktop files held in the cloud just as quickly as you can browse local files in 'File manager' (really). When you tap on the phone icon, you are browsing local files with a view to uploading to your SugarSync account.īrowsing the files stored on (and synchronised to) SugarSync feels quick, and lacks the slight lag that some Qt applications still seem to have. So tapping on the laptop icon will bring up that folder.īecause of battery, storage and bandwidth limitations, your mobile device does not synchronise with the service. In the screen shot below, I registered my laptop, "Ranger", with SugarSync, and only opted to have my desktop folder synchronised. Icons are shown for every computer that you’ve registered with the service, and tapping on them shows the list of their folders selected for online sync. The main menu of SugarSync for Symbian replicates the primary locations on offer on the service’s desktop website. Therefore, SugarSync is better aimed at backing up specific locations on your computer than Dropbox, but this also makes it slightly more complicated to synchronise files between different computers than with Dropbox. ![]() Whereas Dropbox puts one folder on your computer which will synchronise with the Dropbox servers, SugarSync asks you to register each of your computers and select which of their folders will be synchronised with your account on their servers i.e. Also, SugarSync offers 5GB for free versus Dropbox’s 2GB. Actually, the two work slightly differently and so SugarSync may suit some usage patterns better than others. SugarSync is an established cloud backup service, and is a solid competitor to Dropbox. ![]()
0 Comments
![]() ![]() Hotel Kempinski Palace Portorož ***** (at Obala 45 in Portorož, distanced approximately 630 metres).Grand Hotel Portoroz - LifeClass Hotels & Spa ***** (at Obala 33 in Portorož, distanced approximately 520 metres).SD Portoroz Prenocisca Korotan ** (at Obala 11 in Portorož, distanced approximately 510 metres).Hotel Apollo - LifeClass Hotels & Spa **** (at Obala 33 in Portorož, distanced approximately 470 metres).Hotel Neptun - LifeClass Hotels & Spa **** (at Obala 33 in Portorož, distanced approximately 450 metres).Apartments Portoroz *** (at Prečna Pot 3A in Portorož, distanced approximately 450 metres).LifeClass Resort Hotels **** (at Obala 33 in Portorož, distanced approximately 440 metres).LifeClass Spa Hotels **** (at Obala 43 in Portorož, distanced approximately 440 metres).Hotel Marko **** (at Obala 28 in Portorož, distanced approximately 440 metres).Hotel Mirna - LifeClass Hotels & Spa **** (at Obala 33 in Portorož, distanced approximately 390 metres).Hotels in the neighbourhood of the Maestral Residence hotel Portoroz are sorted by the distance from this hotel. Other hotels near to Maestral Residence hotel Portoroz The hotel is located at Belokriska cesta 3 in Portorož, Piran, Slovenia – see Portorož map ». Always bear in mind that with and the best price is guaranteed! Luxury hotels (including 5 star hotels and 4 star hotels) and cheap Portoroz hotels (with best discount rates and up-to-date hotel deals) are both available in separate lists. Many photos and unbiased hotel reviews written by real guests are provided to help you make your booking decision. The reservation system is secure and your personal information and credit card is encrypted. , being established in 1996, is longtime Europe’s leader in online hotel reservations.Īt you won't be charged any booking fees, cancellation fees (see particular hotel policies), or administration fees – the reservation service is free of charge. in partnership with offers highly competitive rates for all types of hotels in Portoroz, from affordable family hotels to the most luxurious ones. For all the groups bigger than 20 people, security deposit of 300€ is applicable.Why to book your stay at Maestral Residence hotel Portoroz with us Please note that the hotel requires all guests to pay upon check in. Spa and gym facilities at this property are unavailable due to the coronavirus (COVID-19). In accordance with government guidelines to minimize transmission of the coronavirus (COVID-19), this property may request additional documentation from guests to validate identity, travel itinerary, and other relevant info on dates where such guidelines exist. Due to the coronavirus (COVID-19), this property has reduced reception and service hours. Certain services and amenities may be reduced or unavailable as a result. Due to the coronavirus (COVID-19), this property is taking steps to protect the safety of guests and staff. As a result of the coronavirus (COVID-19), this property has temporarily suspended its shuttle services. Food and beverage services at this property may be limited or unavailable due to the coronavirus (COVID-19). In response to the coronavirus (COVID-19), additional safety and sanitation measures are in effect at this property. ![]() Please note that all Special Requests are subject to availability and additional charges may apply. Guests are required to show a photo ID and credit card upon check-in. Parking is subject to availability due to limited spaces. ![]() ![]() ![]() I recommend it not only because it works as it should, but also because, so far, after more than a year, it is the less troublesome application that I use, bar none. ClipGrab is designed for downloading videos from YouTube and it is for free, as are its occasional updates. A horizontal blue bar and a percentage number at the top of the screen show the download’s progress. This powerful AI software is capable of upscaling video to 4K resolution. I direct it to a folder I have created and labelled “Videos”, press on a button labelled “Download” - and that is that. Upscale videos without introducing artifacts: One of the biggest problems with. I then click a button labelled “Grab this clip”, and that opens a small dialog box that asks me where I want to save the clip. ![]() ![]() I first locate a video I would like to download using a browser (usually Waterfox), copy the URL and paste it in a field in the GUI of ClipGrab. It does not work as a browser add-on, but independently of any of browser. It has a very straightforward graphical interface and it is very easy to set up. If you decided to try ClipGrab with Linux Mint, I would be interested to know how that works out. But at least the biggest violator of our privacy will be shut down as a company. Of course, every person who has ever been online has been spied on by Google, so I don’t know how much each person will get. Google should be shut down as a company, and their assets sold and then distributed to those whose privacy has been violated by Google. Because Microsoft owns the dominant OS, they should not be allowed to sell application software. When you own the OS and the applications, your applications have an unfair advantage over all competitors. At that time WordPerfect was the market leader for word processors soon, Word overtook them and everyone else. (2) WordPerfect used to complain that when Windows came out, Microsoft didn’t reveal all of the APIs to WordPerfect and others, causing WordPerfect for Windows to not perform as well as Word for Windows. I remember reading comments to the effect that Microsoft wrote code that woundn’t work as well under DR-DOS as it worked under MS-DOS, causing people to abandon DR-DOS. A couple of cases I heard about: (1) DR-DOS was a competitor to MS-DOS. Ages ago, on their way to the top, Microsoft used to do this sort of thing to competitors. I wouldn’t be a bit surprised if this were true. ![]() |