![]() ![]() I recommend it not only because it works as it should, but also because, so far, after more than a year, it is the less troublesome application that I use, bar none. ClipGrab is designed for downloading videos from YouTube and it is for free, as are its occasional updates. A horizontal blue bar and a percentage number at the top of the screen show the download’s progress. This powerful AI software is capable of upscaling video to 4K resolution. I direct it to a folder I have created and labelled “Videos”, press on a button labelled “Download” - and that is that. Upscale videos without introducing artifacts: One of the biggest problems with. I then click a button labelled “Grab this clip”, and that opens a small dialog box that asks me where I want to save the clip. ![]() ![]() I first locate a video I would like to download using a browser (usually Waterfox), copy the URL and paste it in a field in the GUI of ClipGrab. It does not work as a browser add-on, but independently of any of browser. It has a very straightforward graphical interface and it is very easy to set up. If you decided to try ClipGrab with Linux Mint, I would be interested to know how that works out. But at least the biggest violator of our privacy will be shut down as a company. Of course, every person who has ever been online has been spied on by Google, so I don’t know how much each person will get. Google should be shut down as a company, and their assets sold and then distributed to those whose privacy has been violated by Google. Because Microsoft owns the dominant OS, they should not be allowed to sell application software. When you own the OS and the applications, your applications have an unfair advantage over all competitors. At that time WordPerfect was the market leader for word processors soon, Word overtook them and everyone else. (2) WordPerfect used to complain that when Windows came out, Microsoft didn’t reveal all of the APIs to WordPerfect and others, causing WordPerfect for Windows to not perform as well as Word for Windows. I remember reading comments to the effect that Microsoft wrote code that woundn’t work as well under DR-DOS as it worked under MS-DOS, causing people to abandon DR-DOS. A couple of cases I heard about: (1) DR-DOS was a competitor to MS-DOS. Ages ago, on their way to the top, Microsoft used to do this sort of thing to competitors. I wouldn’t be a bit surprised if this were true. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |